<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The All New BuddyPress.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wpmu.org/the-all-new-buddypressorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wpmu.org/the-all-new-buddypressorg/</link>
	<description>WordPress, Multisite &#38; BuddyPress plugins, themes, news and reviews and special offers from the team at WPMU.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: donnacha &#124; WordSkill</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/the-all-new-buddypressorg/#comment-2570</link>
		<dc:creator>donnacha &#124; WordSkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=755#comment-2570</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder how/if this will effect the eventual redesign &amp; setup of mu.wordpress.org - I mean, come on guys, the poor ol’ site is looking pretty dated these days!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d prefer it if, instead, they focused on getting MU 2.7.1 released, so that Andy can release the 1.0 of BuddyPress.

It&#039;s been over six weeks since WordPress 2.7.1 was released, on February 10, and 2.8, due in early April, is &lt;a href=&quot;http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_2.8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;shaping up to be a pretty major release&lt;/a&gt;.  MU is an wonderful, wonderful product but the dependency on MU is BuddyPress&#039; biggest drawback at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder how/if this will effect the eventual redesign &amp; setup of mu.wordpress.org &#8211; I mean, come on guys, the poor ol’ site is looking pretty dated these days!</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer it if, instead, they focused on getting MU 2.7.1 released, so that Andy can release the 1.0 of BuddyPress.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been over six weeks since WordPress 2.7.1 was released, on February 10, and 2.8, due in early April, is <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_2.8" rel="nofollow">shaping up to be a pretty major release</a>.  MU is an wonderful, wonderful product but the dependency on MU is BuddyPress&#8217; biggest drawback at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/the-all-new-buddypressorg/#comment-2565</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=755#comment-2565</guid>
		<description>Nice, cross pollination indeed :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, cross pollination indeed :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy P</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/the-all-new-buddypressorg/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=755#comment-2559</guid>
		<description>So basically what I&#039;m saying is - if you have a plugin in the WordPress plugin repo that is BuddyPress &quot;enabled&quot;, just tag it with &quot;BuddyPress&quot; and it will instantly show up on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically what I&#8217;m saying is &#8211; if you have a plugin in the WordPress plugin repo that is BuddyPress &#8220;enabled&#8221;, just tag it with &#8220;BuddyPress&#8221; and it will instantly show up on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy P</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/the-all-new-buddypressorg/#comment-2558</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=755#comment-2558</guid>
		<description>The plugin repo is actually just the standard WordPress plugin repo. All I&#039;m doing is filtering on plugins that have the &quot;BuddyPress&quot; tag in the readme.txt. The plugin still appears on the WordPress site (there are links on each plugin) and could also appear on the MU site too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plugin repo is actually just the standard WordPress plugin repo. All I&#8217;m doing is filtering on plugins that have the &#8220;BuddyPress&#8221; tag in the readme.txt. The plugin still appears on the WordPress site (there are links on each plugin) and could also appear on the MU site too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

