<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why WordPress.com should use our Supporter plugin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wpmu.org/why-wordpress-com-should-use-our-supporter-plugin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wpmu.org/why-wordpress-com-should-use-our-supporter-plugin/</link>
	<description>Everything WordPressMU at WPMU.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mike Wendell</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/why-wordpress-com-should-use-our-supporter-plugin/comment-page-1/#comment-5012</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mike Wendell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=25488#comment-5012</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For the record, your definition of gorgeous and ours are clearly different.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s OK, Jane.  You&#039;ve shown many times that &lt;a href=&quot;http://drmikessteakdinner.com/2008/10/30/yes-jane-you-are-a-platformist/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you&#039;re out of touch&lt;/a&gt; with the real world.  As has been shown many times over, your definition and that of Matt and the rest of Automattic of ethics is clearly not the same as others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For the record, your definition of gorgeous and ours are clearly different.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s OK, Jane.  You&#8217;ve shown many times that <a href="http://drmikessteakdinner.com/2008/10/30/yes-jane-you-are-a-platformist/" rel="nofollow">you&#8217;re out of touch</a> with the real world.  As has been shown many times over, your definition and that of Matt and the rest of Automattic of ethics is clearly not the same as others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/why-wordpress-com-should-use-our-supporter-plugin/comment-page-1/#comment-4987</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=25488#comment-4987</guid>
		<description>Wow, you guys really are smarter than I gave you credit for, my bad, thanks for clarifying :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you guys really are smarter than I gave you credit for, my bad, thanks for clarifying :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Wells</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/why-wordpress-com-should-use-our-supporter-plugin/comment-page-1/#comment-4986</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=25488#comment-4986</guid>
		<description>Do you really think Automattic hasn&#039;t thought of all those things before, as opposed to simply having chosen not to do them at this time? 

For the record, your definition of gorgeous and ours are clearly different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really think Automattic hasn&#8217;t thought of all those things before, as opposed to simply having chosen not to do them at this time? </p>
<p>For the record, your definition of gorgeous and ours are clearly different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
