<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress MU to be included in Fedora Core 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wpmu.org/wordpress-mu-included-fedora-core-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-mu-included-fedora-core-10/</link>
	<description>WordPress, Multisite &#38; BuddyPress plugins, themes, news and reviews and special offers from the team at WPMU.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret McMillan</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-mu-included-fedora-core-10/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret McMillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=232#comment-474</guid>
		<description>The next logical step is more likely to be getting the package into EPEL:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

I&#039;m not that tuned-in re: CentOS, but I think they try to keep the core distribution equivalent to RHEL, and then allow additional repos to layer on-top.

My biggest concern at this point is the rate at which wpmu is changing; it doesn&#039;t really fit well w/ EPEL&#039;s packaging guidelines.  I may offer more casual RHEL5&#039;ish builds via fedorapeople.org or something along those lines while we see how wpmu fares in f10+, and engage the EPEL folks for longer-range guidance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next logical step is more likely to be getting the package into EPEL:  <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL" rel="nofollow">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not that tuned-in re: CentOS, but I think they try to keep the core distribution equivalent to RHEL, and then allow additional repos to layer on-top.</p>
<p>My biggest concern at this point is the rate at which wpmu is changing; it doesn&#8217;t really fit well w/ EPEL&#8217;s packaging guidelines.  I may offer more casual RHEL5&#8242;ish builds via fedorapeople.org or something along those lines while we see how wpmu fares in f10+, and engage the EPEL folks for longer-range guidance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

