<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Multi Site to replace Multi User!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/</link>
	<description>WordPress, Multisite &#38; BuddyPress plugins, themes, news and reviews and special offers from the team at WPMU.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-8447</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-8447</guid>
		<description>A genuine question because this piece of news affects a fairly important dev strategy for one of my clients. The big issue with MU has always been the problem with shared servers delivering sites with the potential for growth/bandwidth with multi user sites, and alternatives to this problem are the basis of several fairly well known businesses.

Does the merge with WP and MU/S mean that some miracle has happened that obviates the server/hosting issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A genuine question because this piece of news affects a fairly important dev strategy for one of my clients. The big issue with MU has always been the problem with shared servers delivering sites with the potential for growth/bandwidth with multi user sites, and alternatives to this problem are the basis of several fairly well known businesses.</p>
<p>Does the merge with WP and MU/S mean that some miracle has happened that obviates the server/hosting issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Exciting Future of Wordpress! Part 1 &#124; Fresh</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-7795</link>
		<dc:creator>The Exciting Future of Wordpress! Part 1 &#124; Fresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-7795</guid>
		<description>[...] for how the multi-site feature will be enabled and configured.  Unfortunately it looks like native multiple domain name support won&#8217;t be included in the 3.0 release, but we can cross our fingers for a later [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for how the multi-site feature will be enabled and configured.  Unfortunately it looks like native multiple domain name support won&#8217;t be included in the 3.0 release, but we can cross our fingers for a later [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-7375</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-7375</guid>
		<description>Hikari, &quot;multisite&quot; was not decided on as a final name, it&#039;s just what the folks working on the merge started naming all of the functions.

I&#039;m, of course, happy to pay for any registration fees.

I haven&#039;t heard anything from James about these comments or the email I sent him, so not sure what&#039;s going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hikari, &#8220;multisite&#8221; was not decided on as a final name, it&#8217;s just what the folks working on the merge started naming all of the functions.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m, of course, happy to pay for any registration fees.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t heard anything from James about these comments or the email I sent him, so not sure what&#8217;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hikari</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-7374</link>
		<dc:creator>Hikari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-7374</guid>
		<description>Matt, THE guy! :D

Well, first thing you guys should have done just after defining the name was list all domains you thought worthy registering, and second thing was registering them.

Now it&#039;s gone. You should at least offer to pay the registration bill, who would register a domain to donate it afterwards? If you are not willing to buy the domain from him, let him do whatever he wants with those domains.

I imagine Blizzard asking for warcraft4.com and starcraft3.com donations, or Microsoft requesting Mike Rowe for a donation... Of course, Automattic is not like them, but well.

I&#039;d suggest giving up the name, it&#039;s ugly anyway, remembers Wordpress MicroSoft (omg don&#039;t let them read this!! :D ) as somebody noted. It&#039;s still time, choose a better name and REGISTER THOSE DAMN DOMAINS!! :P

How about Wordpress Multi, or Multi Wordpress? *logging on my registrar* :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, THE guy! :D</p>
<p>Well, first thing you guys should have done just after defining the name was list all domains you thought worthy registering, and second thing was registering them.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s gone. You should at least offer to pay the registration bill, who would register a domain to donate it afterwards? If you are not willing to buy the domain from him, let him do whatever he wants with those domains.</p>
<p>I imagine Blizzard asking for warcraft4.com and starcraft3.com donations, or Microsoft requesting Mike Rowe for a donation&#8230; Of course, Automattic is not like them, but well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d suggest giving up the name, it&#8217;s ugly anyway, remembers WordPress MicroSoft (omg don&#8217;t let them read this!! :D ) as somebody noted. It&#8217;s still time, choose a better name and REGISTER THOSE DAMN DOMAINS!! :P</p>
<p>How about WordPress Multi, or Multi WordPress? *logging on my registrar* :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-7188</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-7188</guid>
		<description>Jack, the love is all around. Multi-site was not supposed to be announced yet, and we forgot to register domains around it, but since James was thoughtful enough to pick them up so that&#039;s why I asked about the transfer. It&#039;s against our community policy to have domains with &quot;WordPress&quot; in them, and has been for 4+ years:

http://wordpress.org/about/domains/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, the love is all around. Multi-site was not supposed to be announced yet, and we forgot to register domains around it, but since James was thoughtful enough to pick them up so that&#8217;s why I asked about the transfer. It&#8217;s against our community policy to have domains with &#8220;WordPress&#8221; in them, and has been for 4+ years:</p>
<p><a href="http://wordpress.org/about/domains/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/about/domains/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-7186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-7186</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s the love Matt? You know that someone would purchase as many domains as they could for a very popular product. Why grumble because they are in the hands of someone who actually wants to promote Wordpress? If Wordpress wanted them, shouldn&#039;t they have bought them before they revealed the new name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s the love Matt? You know that someone would purchase as many domains as they could for a very popular product. Why grumble because they are in the hands of someone who actually wants to promote WordPress? If WordPress wanted them, shouldn&#8217;t they have bought them before they revealed the new name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-7181</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-7181</guid>
		<description>James, thank you for pre-registering all variations of &quot;WordPress Multisite&quot; domains. Would you be up to donating those to WordPress so they&#039;re not misused?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, thank you for pre-registering all variations of &#8220;WordPress Multisite&#8221; domains. Would you be up to donating those to WordPress so they&#8217;re not misused?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WPMS the product formly known as WPMU &#171; DIARY OF A WEBSITE :: DESIGN BY CAFFEINE</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-7147</link>
		<dc:creator>WPMS the product formly known as WPMU &#171; DIARY OF A WEBSITE :: DESIGN BY CAFFEINE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-7147</guid>
		<description>[...] looking like it&#8217;s going to become WP MS (WordPress Multi Site). The news was broken over at WPMU.org. This left me a bit puzzled in my simple designer head though as to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looking like it&#8217;s going to become WP MS (WordPress Multi Site). The news was broken over at WPMU.org. This left me a bit puzzled in my simple designer head though as to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordpress 3 (Noscope)</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-7134</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordpress 3 (Noscope)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-7134</guid>
		<description>[...] Work has started on version 3 of Wordpress, and while I&#8217;m looking forward to custom post types (so I can build &#8220;Add News&#8221;, &#8220;Add Employee&#8221;, &#8220;Add Video&#8221; sections), the big news is the merge with Wordpress Multi User. Rumors are, it&#8217;ll be renamed Wordpress Multi Site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Work has started on version 3 of WordPress, and while I&#8217;m looking forward to custom post types (so I can build &#8220;Add News&#8221;, &#8220;Add Employee&#8221;, &#8220;Add Video&#8221; sections), the big news is the merge with WordPress Multi User. Rumors are, it&#8217;ll be renamed WordPress Multi Site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bullis</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wordpress-multi-site-multi-user-mu-ms/#comment-7133</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bullis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=27364#comment-7133</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see something new about the whole integration thing.  I&#039;ve personally refrained from entertaining WPMU type projects until it&#039;s all over with.  Can&#039;t wait to see how it all comes out in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see something new about the whole integration thing.  I&#8217;ve personally refrained from entertaining WPMU type projects until it&#8217;s all over with.  Can&#8217;t wait to see how it all comes out in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

