<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WPMU 2.6.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wpmu.org/wpmu-265/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wpmu.org/wpmu-265/</link>
	<description>WordPress, Multisite &#38; BuddyPress plugins, themes, news and reviews and special offers from the team at WPMU.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiranthi</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wpmu-265/#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiranthi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=532#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Joe. Although the 2.7 admin interface probably is visually more appealing than 2.6.5 I prefer 2.6.5
That and the fact that I constantly have to look where stuff has been put (the nav in my WP2.7 install works a little weird too, for some links the bg&#039;s - Manage and Write - are missing, but I guess that&#039;s a bug in my install) makes me considering not upgrading to 2.7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Joe. Although the 2.7 admin interface probably is visually more appealing than 2.6.5 I prefer 2.6.5<br />
That and the fact that I constantly have to look where stuff has been put (the nav in my WP2.7 install works a little weird too, for some links the bg&#8217;s &#8211; Manage and Write &#8211; are missing, but I guess that&#8217;s a bug in my install) makes me considering not upgrading to 2.7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boonika</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wpmu-265/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Boonika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=532#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>I hate upgrading</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate upgrading</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wpmu-265/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=532#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>Hey, is that some sort of hint? ;)

On the up side, for those who have put off upgrading since &lt; 1.5, they can finally go over to 2.7 and skip the admin change in the middle.

I actually really like the 2.7 admin area, and the other changes in WPMU are really going to be exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, is that some sort of hint? ;)</p>
<p>On the up side, for those who have put off upgrading since &lt; 1.5, they can finally go over to 2.7 and skip the admin change in the middle.</p>
<p>I actually really like the 2.7 admin area, and the other changes in WPMU are really going to be exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wpmu-265/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=532#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely skinnable, am not sure if there&#039;s a plugin about for that yet though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely skinnable, am not sure if there&#8217;s a plugin about for that yet though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://wpmu.org/wpmu-265/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wpmu.org/?p=532#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m considering not upgrading to 2.7 at all. I think the 2.6 admin interface is better. Is there a way to use the 2.6 admin design on 2.7?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m considering not upgrading to 2.7 at all. I think the 2.6 admin interface is better. Is there a way to use the 2.6 admin design on 2.7?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

